English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A communicability-driven expert influence model for large-scale group decision-making based on complex network theory

Authors

Sun,  Fenglan
External Organizations;

Yi,  Yuteng
External Organizations;

Zhu,  Wei
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Juergen.Kurths

Kurths,  Jürgen
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Sun, F., Yi, Y., Zhu, W., Kurths, J. (2025): A communicability-driven expert influence model for large-scale group decision-making based on complex network theory. - Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 160, Part A, 111789.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111789


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33297
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) framework based on complex network theory. First, by enhancing the clustering efficiency of the Louvain algorithm through complex network theory, this framework enables community classification of a large-scale expert group, thereby reduce the complexity of the expert network and improve decision-making efficiency. Second, a novel communicability-driven expert influence identification model within expert social networks is designed, and a new consensus feedback mechanism is proposed. This approach comprehensively considers both the individual influence of experts and the impact of their interactions to guide consensus-reaching, which can accurately reflect the actual flow of information within the network. Third, by extending the Best–Worst Method and Shannon Entropy Method to the context of fuzzy information, a balance between subjectivity and objectivity is obtained, which can make more accurate and interpretable decision results. The proposed method is validated through a case study on green material selection. Moreover, its superiority is further demonstrated through comparative experiments. The results show that our method demonstrates a 9.89% reduction in opinion revision costs with accelerated consensus-reaching efficiency.