English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

European bioeconomy strategies could better integrate sustainability agendas

Authors

Warchold,  Anne
External Organizations;

Li,  Jing
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/prajal.pradhan

Pradhan,  Prajal       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s11625-025-01752-1.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Warchold, A., Li, J., Pradhan, P. (2025 online): European bioeconomy strategies could better integrate sustainability agendas. - Sustainability Science.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01752-1


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33777
Abstract
The bioeconomy is increasingly seen as a key national development strategy for sustainable economic growth, environmental restoration, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Numerous countries have introduced strategies to outline their bioeconomy visions, aiming to transition from fossil fuel-dependent systems to bioeconomies that address pressing environmental and socio-economic challenges. Despite this potential, the bioeconomy is not inherently sustainable nor circular, and policymakers pursue bioeconomies to different extents, facing challenges in balancing synergies and trade-offs with the SDGs. This study examined bioeconomy strategies presented in 29 policy documents from 14 European countries and the European Union. Using text analyzing techniques, we evaluate the extent to which bioeconomy strategies determine the salience of sustainability. Our analysis shows that most bioeconomy strategies emphasize opportunities aligned with SDGs 6 and 12–15, focusing on environmental objectives within the planet pillar of the 2030 Agenda. However, these strategies often neglect the principles of “equitable” and “fair & inclusive” transition and fail to consider potential unintended consequences or trade-offs for sustainability. This disconnection is further reflected by a significant divide between evidence on bioeconomy–SDG interactions and the narratives presented in policy documents. The concepts of sustainability and circularity are theoretically integrated into bioeconomy strategies but often remain lethargic, focusing on narratives rather than evidence on existing trade-offs at the expense of human needs and ecosystems. To prevent the risk of unsustainable transitions, bioeconomy strategies should evolve toward systemic approaches that emphasize resilience, equity, and ecological regeneration. Future research should explore practical mechanisms for aligning bioeconomy development with global sustainability goals.