English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Report

International Attitudes Toward Global Policies

Authors

Fabre,  Adrien
External Organizations;

Douenne,  Thomas
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Linus.Mattauch

Mattauch,  Linus
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PuRe
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Fabre, A., Douenne, T., Mattauch, L. (2023): International Attitudes Toward Global Policies, (Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers ; 22), Berlin : Berlin School of Economics, 111 p.
https://doi.org/10.48462/opus4-5024


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34451
Abstract
We document majority support for policies entailing global redistribution and climate mitigation. Recent surveys on 40,680 respondents in 20 countries covering 72% of global carbon emissions show strong support for an effective and progressive way to combat climate change and poverty: a global carbon price funding a global basic income, called the “Global Climate Scheme” (GCS). Using complementary surveys on 8,000 respondents in the U.S., France, Germany, Spain, and the UK, we test several hypotheses that could reconcile strong stated support with a lack of salience in policy circles. A list experiment shows no evidence of social desirability bias, majorities are willing to sign a real-stake petition, and global redistribution ranks high in the prioritization of policies. Conjoint analyses reveal that a platform is more likely to be preferred if it contains the GCS or a global tax on millionaires. Universalistic attitudes are confirmed by an incentivized donation. In sum, our findings indicate that global policies are genuinely supported by a majority of the population. Public opinion is therefore not the reason that they do not prominently enter political debates.