English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The Electoral Impact of Housing Climate Policy: Evidence from Germany

Authors
/persons/resource/Dorothea.Kistinger

Kistinger,  Dorothea
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/noah.koegel

Kögel,  Noah       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/koch.nicolas

Koch,  Nicolas       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/kalkuhl

Kalkuhl,  Matthias       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s10640-026-01092-3.pdf
(Publisher version), 6MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kistinger, D., Kögel, N., Koch, N., Kalkuhl, M. (2026): The Electoral Impact of Housing Climate Policy: Evidence from Germany. - Environmental and Resource Economics, 89, 51.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-026-01092-3


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34800
Abstract
The transition to carbon-neutral residential heating poses extraordinary policy challenges to societies in Europe and beyond. In this paper, we study the electoral consequences of an amendment to the German Building Energy Act (GEG) aimed at phasing-out fossil-based heating systems. We use granular building stock data to approximate heterogeneity in household compliance costs and apply difference-in-differences and triple difference models to estimate its impacts on vote shares at the municipal level. For the state elections in Bavaria and Hesse, we find relative gains for the far-right (+2.4 pp) and conservative opposition parties (+6.5 pp) and losses for the incumbent federal government parties (−2.9 pp) in the baseline specification of our model. For the latter two, the effects are more pronounced in rural municipalities. These findings highlight the importance of holistic climate policy approaches that account for salient and heterogeneous costs to mitigate political backlash.