English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

How cities can govern their carbon footprints despite measurement challenges—an analysis of climate planning in eight international anchor cities

Authors

Zengerling,  Cathrin
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/pichler

Pichler,  Peter-Paul       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

John,  Nikita M.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/ingram.jaccard

Jaccard,  Ingram S.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Harseim,  Lisa
External Organizations;

Alahwal,  Ahmed Tarek
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Helga.Weisz

Weisz,  Helga       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

34818oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 871KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Zengerling, C., Pichler, P.-P., John, N. M., Jaccard, I. S., Harseim, L., Alahwal, A. T., Weisz, H. (2026): How cities can govern their carbon footprints despite measurement challenges—an analysis of climate planning in eight international anchor cities. - Environmental Research: Climate, 5, 3, 035039.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5295/ae83db


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34818
Abstract
Cities are increasingly positioned as key climate actors through transnational networks and greenhouse gas emissions reduction pledges. Upstream emissions from the consumption of goods and services account for a major portion of total urban carbon footprints. However, most city climate action plans (CAPs) only account for territorial and energy consumption-related upstream emissions, rather than addressing full consumption-based emissions. This gap is often linked to the legal limitation of municipal authority to territorial boundaries. Here, we show that cities have substantial untapped policy potential to address consumption-based emissions. The greatest missed opportunities are found in cities with extensive legal powers rather than limited authority. By analyzing eight international cities, we found that household carbon footprints ranged from 2 to 12.1 tCO2eq per capita and year. Current CAPs addressed sectors representing 60% of indirect emissions with at least one mitigation measure, while sectors representing 40% of indirect emissions remained entirely unaddressed. All cities can address their entire carbon footprint through soft measures, and six out of eight could address over 75% of indirect emissions through hard regulatory measures. The scope of climate action on consumption-based emissions is determined by political will, policy prioritization and administrative capacities rather than legal constraints. We discuss pathways for cities to address these emissions despite the ongoing challenges of accurate measurement and monitoring. Strengthening local democratic decision-making processes can enhance the legitimacy and accountability of consumption-focused climate action, and city networks as well as national legislation could play a key role in scaling up implementation.