Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the 
Paris Agreement

Fuglestvedt, J.; Rogelj, J.; Millar, R. J.; Allen, M.; Boucher, O.; Cain, M.; Forster, P. M.; Kriegler, Elmar; Shindell, D.

doi:10.1098/rsta.2016.0445

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Zur Ablage hinzufügen

Lokale TagsFreigabegeschichteDetailsÜbersicht

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement

Urheber*innen

Fuglestvedt, J.
External Organizations;

Rogelj, J.
External Organizations;

Millar, R. J.
External Organizations;

Allen, M.
External Organizations;

Boucher, O.
External Organizations;

Cain, M.
External Organizations;

Forster, P. M.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Elmar.Kriegler

Kriegler, Elmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Shindell, D.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen

Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt

Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PIKpublic verfügbar

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar

Zitation

Fuglestvedt, J., Rogelj, J., Millar, R. J., Allen, M., Boucher, O., Cain, M., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Shindell, D. (2018): Implications of possible interpretations of ‘greenhouse gas balance’ in the Paris Agreement. - Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 376, 2119, 20160445.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0445

Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22355

Zusammenfassung

The main goal of the Paris Agreement as stated in Article 2 is ‘holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C’. Article 4 points to this long-term goal and the need to achieve ‘balance between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks of greenhouse gases'. This statement on ‘greenhouse gas balance’ is subject to interpretation, and clarifications are needed to make it operational for national and international climate policies. We study possible interpretations from a scientific perspective and analyse their climatic implications. We clarify how the implications for individual gases depend on the metrics used to relate them. We show that the way in which balance is interpreted, achieved and maintained influences temperature outcomes. Achieving and maintaining net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions conventionally calculated using GWP100 (100-year global warming potential) and including substantial positive contributions from short-lived climate-forcing agents such as methane would result in a sustained decline in global temperature. A modified approach to the use of GWP100 (that equates constant emissions of short-lived climate forcers with zero sustained emission of CO2) results in global temperatures remaining approximately constant once net-zero CO2-equivalent emissions are achieved and maintained. Our paper provides policymakers with an overview of issues and choices that are important to determine which approach is most appropriate in the context of the Paris Agreement.