Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Mapping human-nature archetypes to guide global biodiversity, food security and land-use policy

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/Diana.Sietz

Sietz,  Diana
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Niamir,  Aidin
External Organizations;

Müller ,  Daniel
External Organizations;

Hickler,  Thomas
External Organizations;

Kanemoto,  Keiichiro
External Organizations;

Moran,  Daniel Dean
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Kirsten.Thonicke

Thonicke,  Kirsten       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

32509oa.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 5MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Sietz, D., Niamir, A., Müller, D., Hickler, T., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. D., Thonicke, K. (2025): Mapping human-nature archetypes to guide global biodiversity, food security and land-use policy. - One Earth, 8, 8, 101416.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101416


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32509
Zusammenfassung
Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food security, and sustainable agriculture at global scale requires a clear understanding of regional social-ecological opportunities and challenges. This understanding helps untap regional contributions to better achieve global policy targets, such as those framed in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF). Yet previous global syntheses of social-ecological interlinkages remain limited in thematic and spatial detail, restricting the discussion of regional contributions and targeted policy implementation. Here, we present 25 human-nature archetypes derived from clustering of global social-ecological data revealing regional opportunities and challenges for meeting global policy targets. Our results differentiate regions with large conservation opportunities from those well suited for ecological restoration or ecological intensification. They highlight the widespread need for improving governance to enhance food security and re-design agricultural systems. Overall, our analysis supports international and national decision makers in tailoring GBF targets to regional specificities in order to more effectively achieve global sustainability goals.