English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

A holistic assessment framework for marine carbon dioxide removal options

Authors

Baatz,  Christian
External Organizations;

Tank,  Lukas
External Organizations;

Bednarz,  Lena-Katharina
External Organizations;

Böttcher,  Miranda
External Organizations;

Morganti,  Teresa Maria
External Organizations;

Voget-Kleschin,  Lieske
External Organizations;

Cabus,  Tony
External Organizations;

Doorn,  Erik van
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/tabea.dorndorf

Dorndorf,  Tabea
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Havermann,  Felix
External Organizations;

Holzhüter,  Wanda
External Organizations;

Keller,  David
External Organizations;

Kreuzburg,  Matthias
External Organizations;

Matz-Lück,  Nele
External Organizations;

Mengis,  Nadine
External Organizations;

Merk,  Christine
External Organizations;

Moustakis,  Yiannis
External Organizations;

Pongratz,  Julia
External Organizations;

Wehnert,  Hendrikje
External Organizations;

Yao,  Wanxuan
External Organizations;

Rehder,  Gregor
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

32783oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Baatz, C., Tank, L., Bednarz, L.-K., Böttcher, M., Morganti, T. M., Voget-Kleschin, L., Cabus, T., Doorn, E. v., Dorndorf, T., Havermann, F., Holzhüter, W., Keller, D., Kreuzburg, M., Matz-Lück, N., Mengis, N., Merk, C., Moustakis, Y., Pongratz, J., Wehnert, H., Yao, W., Rehder, G. (2025): A holistic assessment framework for marine carbon dioxide removal options. - Environmental Research Letters, 20, 5, 054047.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/adc93f


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_32783
Abstract
Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) options could potentially play an important role in future CDR policy portfolios. They include, for example, ocean alkalinity enhancement, blue carbon projects such as mangrove cultivation, as well as sub-seabed storage of captured atmospheric CO2. In this paper we present a novel assessment framework designed for mCDR options. The framework provides important conceptual advancements to existing frameworks currently used to assess climate options: It clearly distinguishes between and allows for the assessment of both the feasibility and desirability of mCDR options, it makes explicit the evaluative standards upon which the assessment is based and it separates the descriptive listing of information from the evaluation of said information. The assessment framework aims to advance the debate on what role mCDR can and should play in responding to the climate crisis by providing a tool for both policymakers and stakeholders to assess mCDR options in a transparent and comprehensive way.