English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Socio-ecological inequalities in housing consumption: How income, urban form, and tenure drive carbon footprints

Authors

Savini,  Federico
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/mira.kopp

Kopp,  Mira       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Hochstenbach,  Cody
External Organizations;

Cohen,  Leshem
External Organizations;

Berrill,  Peter
External Organizations;

Merciai,  Stefano
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1-s2.0-S0921800925003799-main.pdf
(Publisher version), 18MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Savini, F., Kopp, M., Hochstenbach, C., Cohen, L., Berrill, P., Merciai, S. (2025 online): Socio-ecological inequalities in housing consumption: How income, urban form, and tenure drive carbon footprints. - Ecological Economics, 242, 108896.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108896


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33953
Abstract
The provision of decent housing is both a global social priority and a productive activity with long-term environmental implications. Investigating the unequal distribution of housing resources and their associated greenhouse gas emissions, from heating to materials, construction, and use, allows us to foreground housing as a key site of socio-ecological inequalities in today’s economies. This paper develops a model for assessing such inequalities as they relate to the overall use of materials and energy in the provision and operation of housing. Our interdisciplinary and multidimensional analysis of housing consumption in the Netherlands brings together income, urban form, building age, tenure, and housing typology, and includes patterns of mobility and daily use. We draw on a unique combination of sources—register data about the Dutch population and housing stock, a mobility survey, and life cycle inventory data—to reveal that a) the carbon footprint per person differs starkly between richest and poorest groups; b) the low-density locations and income of richer households drive mobility emissions; c) rental units show larger carbon footprints related t lower quality housing stock; and d) suburbanization offsets emissions-saving investments in owner-occupied stock. We end by calling for further interdisciplinary research into ways to provide socially just and environmentally sustainable housing, and policy interventions to tackle excess in housing consumption, invest in social rental stock, and foster density in planning policies.