English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Carbon footprint inequality: A scaling decomposition across 165 countries (1980–2019)

Authors

Zhang,  Peiran
External Organizations;

Gao,  Liang
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Yunfei.Li

Li,  Yunfei
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Zhang,  Chaoyang
External Organizations;

Chen,  Xiqun (Michael)
External Organizations;

Fan,  Jingfang
External Organizations;

Li,  Daqing
External Organizations;

Jia,  Bin
External Organizations;

Gao,  Ziyou
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Juergen.Kurths

Kurths,  Jürgen
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Mendes,  Jose F.F.
External Organizations;

External Resource
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Zhang, P., Gao, L., Li, Y., Zhang, C., Chen, X. (., Fan, J., Li, D., Jia, B., Gao, Z., Kurths, J., Mendes, J. F. (2026): Carbon footprint inequality: A scaling decomposition across 165 countries (1980–2019). - Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 208, Part 2, 118215.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.118215


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34753
Abstract
Individuals contribute to carbon emissions unequally. Yet, this inequality is often attributed solely to individual differences, overlooking the role of structural, societal-scale effects. Using a scaling framework, we analyze four decades of annual carbon footprint inequality data (1980–2019) across 165 countries. We uncover two distinct characteristics of high-emission groups: (i) Their emissions grow at a faster rate as population increases (societal-scale effects). (ii) They maintain higher emissions independent of population size (individual baseline). By proposing a counterfactual adjustment method, we reveal that baseline disparities are the dominant driver of inequality, while societal-scale effects also play a critical role. If all individuals shared the same return to scale as the bottom 10%, the global Gini index could be reduced by 18% and total emissions by 23%. Furthermore, we examine how these patterns vary across different economic contexts to inform more targeted policy. Our findings bridge individual and structural perspectives, advocating fairness-oriented climate policies that prioritize reducing baseline emissions while addressing the amplifying role of societal-scale effects.