English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Multimodel evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland

Fuchs, K., Merbold, L., Buchmann, N., Bretscher, D., Brilli, L., Fitton, N., Topp, C. F. E., Klumpp, K., Lieffering, M., Martin, R., Newton, P. C. D., Rees, R. M., Rolinski, S., Smith, P., Snow, V. (2020): Multimodel evaluation of nitrous oxide emissions from an intensively managed grassland. - Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 125, 1, e2019JG005261.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JG005261

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
24095oa.pdf (Publisher version), 3MB
Name:
24095oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Fuchs, Kathrin1, Author
Merbold, Lutz1, Author
Buchmann, Nina1, Author
Bretscher, Daniel1, Author
Brilli, Lorenzo1, Author
Fitton, Nuala1, Author
Topp, Cairistiona F. E.1, Author
Klumpp, Katja1, Author
Lieffering, Mark1, Author
Martin, Raphaël1, Author
Newton, Paul C. D.1, Author
Rees, Robert M.1, Author
Rolinski, Susanne2, Author              
Smith, Pete1, Author
Snow, Val1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Process‐based models are useful for assessing the impact of changing management practices and climate on yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agricultural systems such as grasslands. They can be used to construct national GHG inventories using a Tier 3 approach. However, accurate simulations of nitrous oxide (N2O) fluxes remain challenging. Models are limited by our understanding of soil‐plant‐microbe interactions and the impact of uncertainty in measured input parameters on simulated outputs. To improve model performance, thorough evaluations against in situ measurements are needed. Experimental data of N2O emissions under two management practices (control with typical fertilization versus increased clover and no fertilization) were acquired in a Swiss field experiment. We conducted a multimodel evaluation with three commonly used biogeochemical models (DayCent in two variants, PaSim, APSIM in two variants) comparing four years of data. DayCent was the most accurate model for simulating N2O fluxes on annual timescales, while APSIM was most accurate for daily N2O fluxes. The multimodel ensemble average reduced the error in estimated annual fluxes by 41% compared to an estimate using the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)‐derived method for the Swiss agricultural GHG inventory (IPCC‐Swiss), but individual models were not systematically more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss. The model ensemble overestimated the N2O mitigation effect of the clover‐based treatment (measured: 39–45%; ensemble: 52–57%) but was more accurate than IPCC‐Swiss (IPCC‐Swiss: 72–81%). These results suggest that multimodel ensembles are valuable for estimating the impact of climate and management on N2O emissions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s):
 Dates: 2020-01-212020
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: -
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1029/2019JG005261
PIKDOMAIN: RD2 - Climate Resilience
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Research topic keyword: Food & Agriculture
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: Ecosystems
Model / method: LPJmL
Model / method: Model Intercomparison
Regional keyword: Europe
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Working Group: Land Use and Resilience
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 125 (1) Sequence Number: e2019JG005261 Start / End Page: - Identifier: ISSN: 2169-8953
Other: Wiley
Other: American Geophysical Union (AGU)
Other: 2169-8961
CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/jgr_biogeosciences
Publisher: American Geophysical Union (AGU)