日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存
 
 
ダウンロード電子メール
  Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions

Grosjean, G., Fuss, S., Koch, N., Bodirsky, B. L., De Cara, S., & Acworth, W. (2018). Options to overcome the barriers to pricing European agricultural emissions. Climate Policy, 18(2), 151-169. doi:10.1080/14693062.2016.1258630.

Item is

基本情報

表示: 非表示:
資料種別: 学術論文

ファイル

表示: ファイル
非表示: ファイル
:
7431.pdf (全文テキスト(全般)), 2MB
 
ファイルのパーマリンク:
-
ファイル名:
7431.pdf
説明:
-
閲覧制限:
非公開
MIMEタイプ / チェックサム:
application/pdf
技術的なメタデータ:
著作権日付:
-
著作権情報:
-
CCライセンス:
-

関連URL

表示:

作成者

表示:
非表示:
 作成者:
Grosjean, Godefroy1, 著者              
Fuss, S.2, 著者
Koch, N.2, 著者
Bodirsky, Benjamin Leon1, 著者              
De Cara, S.2, 著者
Acworth, W.2, 著者
所属:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

内容説明

表示:
非表示:
キーワード: -
 要旨: Although agriculture could contribute substantially to European emission reductions, its mitigation potential lies untapped and dormant. Market-based instruments could be pivotal in incentivizing cost-effective abatement. However, sector specificities in transaction costs, leakage risks and distributional impacts impede its implementation. The significance of such barriers critically hinges on the dimensions of policy design. This article synthesizes the work on emissions pricing in agriculture together with the literature on the design of market-based instruments. To structure the discussion, an options space is suggested to map policy options, focusing on three key dimensions of policy design. More specifically, it examines the role of policy coverage, instruments and transfers to farmers in overcoming the barriers. First, the results show that a significant proportion of agricultural emissions and mitigation potential could be covered by a policy targeting large farms and few emission sources, thereby reducing transaction costs. Second, whether an instrument is voluntary or mandatory influences distributional outcomes and leakage. Voluntary instruments can mitigate distributional concerns and leakage risks but can lead to subsidy lock-in and carbon price distortion. Third, the impact on transfers resulting from the interaction of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) with emissions pricing will play a key role in shaping political feasibility and has so far been underappreciated.

資料詳細

表示:
非表示:
言語:
 日付: 2018
 出版の状態: Finally published
 ページ: -
 出版情報: -
 目次: -
 査読: 査読あり
 識別子(DOI, ISBNなど): DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1258630
PIKDOMAIN: Climate Impacts & Vulnerabilities - Research Domain II
PIKDOMAIN: Sustainable Solutions - Research Domain III
eDoc: 7431
Research topic keyword: Food & Agriculture
Research topic keyword: Economics
Research topic keyword: Carbon Pricing
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Model / method: Qualitative Methods
Organisational keyword: RD2 - Climate Resilience
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Working Group: Land Use and Resilience
Working Group: Macroeconomic modeling of climate change mitigation and impacts
 学位: -

関連イベント

表示:

訴訟

表示:

Project information

表示:

出版物 1

表示:
非表示:
出版物名: Climate Policy
種別: 学術雑誌, SCI, Scopus
 著者・編者:
所属:
出版社, 出版地: -
ページ: - 巻号: 18 (2) 通巻号: - 開始・終了ページ: 151 - 169 識別子(ISBN, ISSN, DOIなど): その他: Taylor & Francis
その他: 1752-7457
ISSN: 1469-3062
CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/climate-policy