English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Global spillover effects of the European Green Deal and plausible mitigation options

Zhong, H., Li, Y., Ding, J., Bruckner, B., Feng, K., Sun, L., Prell, C., Shan, Y., Hubacek, K. (2024): Global spillover effects of the European Green Deal and plausible mitigation options. - Nature Sustainability, 7, 1501-1511.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01428-1

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
30280oa.pdf (Publisher version), 6MB
Name:
30280oa.pdf
Description:
-
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Zhong, Honglin1, Author
Li, Yanxian1, Author
Ding, Jiaying1, Author
Bruckner, Benedikt2, Author              
Feng, Kuishuang1, Author
Sun, Laixiang1, Author
Prell, Christina1, Author
Shan, Yuli1, Author
Hubacek, Klaus1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: FutureLab - Social Metabolism and Impacts Climate Policy, Biodiversity, Food & Agriculture, Land Use, Global, Europe
 Abstract: Achieving European Green Deal (EGD) targets for carbon removal and ecological restoration would reduce agricultural and forestry production within the European Union yet simultaneously extend ecosystem impacts elsewhere. Here we quantify such spillover impacts by coupling an extended multi-regional input–output analysis with an agro-ecological zones model. We find that EGD’s agricultural and forestry targets set for 2030 could result in a 23.9 Mha increase in demand for agricultural land outside the European Union, which in turn would lead to an increase in land-use-related carbon emissions by 758.9 MtCO2-equivalent (244.8% of EGD’s carbon removal target in the land, land-use-change and forestry sectors) and a biodiversity loss of 3.86 million mean species abundance loss. Such spillover impacts far exceed the ecological benefits from EGD conservation-based import policies, such as promoting deforestation-free products and phasing out food-based biofuel. We then propose three options beyond the primary targets of the EGD with the aim to mitigate such spillover impacts. The assessment of these options reveals the critical role of reducing meat and dairy consumption, highlighting the impact of consumer behaviour on environmental outcomes. This raises questions about public awareness, willingness to change diets and the role of policy in influencing consumer behaviours.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-08-012024-09-202024-11-01
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 24
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1038/s41893-024-01428-1
PIKDOMAIN: FutureLab - Social Metabolism and Impacts
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Research topic keyword: Land use
Organisational keyword: FutureLab - Social Metabolism and Impacts
Regional keyword: Europe
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Biodiversity
Research topic keyword: Food & Agriculture
OATYPE: Hybrid Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Nature Sustainability
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 7 Sequence Number: - Start / End Page: 1501 - 1511 Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/nature-sustainability
Publisher: Nature