Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

 
 
DownloadE-Mail
  Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era

Li, X., He, S., Gu, Y., Sun, Y. (2025): Unpacking China’s climate policy mixes shows a disconnect between policy density and intensity in the post-Paris era. - npj Climate Action, 4, 30.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-025-00233-6

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
s44168-025-00233-6.pdf (Verlagsversion), 2MB
Name:
s44168-025-00233-6.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Öffentlich
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Li, Xiaoran1, Autor              
He, Shutong2, Autor
Gu, Yuen2, Autor
Sun, Yixian2, Autor
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: Climate Change Policy, Government
 Zusammenfassung: As the world’s largest greenhouse gas emitter, China would make important contributions to the achievement of the Paris goals if it made economy-wide, strong policy interventions to combat climate change. Despite a growing number of studies on China’s climate governance, the overall landscape of China’s climate policy and its key characteristics remain underexamined. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a dataset of 358 climate-related policies adopted by China’s central government in 2016–2022 and assessed key policy mix characteristics including policy density, balance and intensity. Our findings reveal that higher policy density does not equate to stronger action. Significant variation also exists in alignment with China’s Nationally Determined Contributions, especially in high-emitting sectors. Moreover, despite a relatively balanced mix of regulatory, economic, and informational instruments, this balance does not guarantee intensity. Our study shows challenges in China’s policy coherence and calls for stronger mechanisms to integrate national goals into sectoral policies.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2024-08-112025-02-282025-03-242025-03-24
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: 13
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1038/s44168-025-00233-6
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Working Group: Climate Policy and Development
Regional keyword: Asia
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
MDB-ID: pending
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden: ausblenden:
Projektname : GeoKlimRisk
Grant ID : -
Förderprogramm : -
Förderorganisation : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: npj Climate Action
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, other, oa
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 4 Artikelnummer: 30 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/2731-9814
Publisher: Nature