English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability

Roman-Cuesta, R. M., den Elzen, M., Araujo-Gutierrez, Z., Forsell, N., Lamb, W. F., McGlynn, E., Melo, J., Rossi, S., Meinshausen, M., Federici, S., Gidden, M., Keramidas, K., Korosuo, A., Grassi, G. (2025): Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability. - Communications Earth and Environment, 6, 598.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02494-9

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
s43247-025-02494-9.pdf (Publisher version), 1009KB
Name:
s43247-025-02494-9.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Roman-Cuesta, Rosa M.1, Author
den Elzen, Michel1, Author
Araujo-Gutierrez, Zuelclady1, Author
Forsell, Nicklas1, Author
Lamb, William F.2, Author                 
McGlynn, Emily1, Author
Melo, Joana1, Author
Rossi, Simone1, Author
Meinshausen, Malte1, Author
Federici, Sandro1, Author
Gidden, Matthew1, Author
Keramidas, Kimon1, Author
Korosuo, Anu1, Author
Grassi, Giacomo1, Author
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Land carbon fluxes are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries’ land greenhouse gas inventories and mitigation targets, and what land models (bookkeeping and integrated assessments) provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks for land. As a result, the Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models’ benchmarks. Here we track the contribution and evolution of land-related targets under countries’ 2020 Nationally Determined Contributions, splitting land pledges between reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land retains a quarter of the global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly relying on external support (−1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO2e/yr), of which −0.55 GtCO2e/yr are additional sinks. It is crucial that future Global Stocktakes include appropriate comparisons between modelled and country-provided land use net emissions. We here offer some concrete suggestions.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2024-11-042025-05-302025-07-282025-07-28
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 17
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1038/s43247-025-02494-9
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Working Group: Evidence for Climate Solutions
Research topic keyword: Land use
Research topic keyword: 1.5/2°C limit
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
MDB-ID: No MDB - stored outside PIK (see locators/paper)
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Communications Earth and Environment
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 6 Sequence Number: 598 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/communications-earth-environment
Publisher: Nature