English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability

Authors

Roman-Cuesta,  Rosa M.
External Organizations;

den Elzen,  Michel
External Organizations;

Araujo-Gutierrez,  Zuelclady
External Organizations;

Forsell,  Nicklas
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/William.Lamb

Lamb,  William F.       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

McGlynn,  Emily
External Organizations;

Melo,  Joana
External Organizations;

Rossi,  Simone
External Organizations;

Meinshausen,  Malte
External Organizations;

Federici,  Sandro
External Organizations;

Gidden,  Matthew
External Organizations;

Keramidas,  Kimon
External Organizations;

Korosuo,  Anu
External Organizations;

Grassi,  Giacomo
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s43247-025-02494-9.pdf
(Publisher version), 1009KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Roman-Cuesta, R. M., den Elzen, M., Araujo-Gutierrez, Z., Forsell, N., Lamb, W. F., McGlynn, E., Melo, J., Rossi, S., Meinshausen, M., Federici, S., Gidden, M., Keramidas, K., Korosuo, A., Grassi, G. (2025): Land remains a blind spot in tracking progress under the Paris Agreement due to lack of data comparability. - Communications Earth and Environment, 6, 598.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02494-9


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33011
Abstract
Land carbon fluxes are key to the Paris Agreement. However, data comparability issues persist between countries’ land greenhouse gas inventories and mitigation targets, and what land models (bookkeeping and integrated assessments) provide as Paris-aligned benchmarks for land. As a result, the Global Stocktake, aiming to track collective mitigation progress, did not explicitly consider country targets for land. This blind spot leaves countries uninformed of the 2030 gap between their ambitions for mitigation on land and models’ benchmarks. Here we track the contribution and evolution of land-related targets under countries’ 2020 Nationally Determined Contributions, splitting land pledges between reduced emissions and additional sinks. Land retains a quarter of the global mitigation pledges in 2030, mostly relying on external support (−1.5ǂ1.1 GtCO2e/yr), of which −0.55 GtCO2e/yr are additional sinks. It is crucial that future Global Stocktakes include appropriate comparisons between modelled and country-provided land use net emissions. We here offer some concrete suggestions.