English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Dirty talk: Media discourse and the struggle over South Africa’s coal transition

Bez, C. S., Raederscheidt, G., Steckel, J. C. (2025): Dirty talk: Media discourse and the struggle over South Africa’s coal transition. - Energy Research and Social Science, 130, 104398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104398

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
1-s2.0-S2214629625004797-main.pdf (Publisher version), 4MB
Name:
1-s2.0-S2214629625004797-main.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Hybrid
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Bez, Charlotte Sophia1, 2, Author           
Raederscheidt, Giacomo3, Author
Steckel, Jan Christoph1, Author                 
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              
2Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_29970              
3External Organizations, ou_persistent22              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: Energy transitions, Coal, South Africa, Discursive power, Topic modeling, Text as data
 Abstract: This paper investigates media discourses on coal in South Africa to understand the state of progress of its energy transition. We approach discourse as a key element in policy sequencing, shaping the conditions under which regulatory change becomes possible. Using an integrated text-as-data pipeline, including topic modeling, named entity recognition, and sentiment analysis, we analyze approximately 8,000 national newspaper articles from 2010 to 2024. Topic modeling reveals five discourse clusters: Mining industry, Transition politics, Energy crisis, Mining affected communities, and Politics in mining and energy. While new technologies receive attention – particularly around the announcement of the Just Energy Transition Partnership with South Africa in 2021 – explicit discourse on coal phase-out remains marginal. At the same time, we highlight that these technologies are frequently framed as substitutes for structural change. Positive sentiment toward the mining sector and transition politics suggests that the transition is not framed as a coal exit. In this sense, the observed framing reveals not only media priorities but also the discursive power of dominant actors in structuring transition pathways. Our findings underscore the value of combining computational and qualitative approaches innovatively to examine socio-political transition discourses, with implications for broader applications of text-as-data in policy research. Our results inform debates on the political economy of energy transitions at the interplay of international climate finance.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2025-04-182025-10-092025-11-052025-12-01
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 16
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2025.104398
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Working Group: Climate Policy and Development
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Regional keyword: Africa
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
MDB-ID: No data to archive
OATYPE: Hybrid - DEAL Elsevier
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Energy Research and Social Science
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 130 Sequence Number: 104398 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/energy-research-social-science
Publisher: Elsevier