Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Dirty talk: Media discourse and the struggle over South Africa’s coal transition

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/charlotte.sophia.bez

Bez,  Charlotte Sophia
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Raederscheidt,  Giacomo
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Jan.Steckel

Steckel,  Jan Christoph       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (beschränkter Zugriff)
Für Ihren IP-Bereich sind aktuell keine Volltexte freigegeben.
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

1-s2.0-S2214629625004797-main.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 4MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Bez, C. S., Raederscheidt, G., Steckel, J. C. (2025): Dirty talk: Media discourse and the struggle over South Africa’s coal transition. - Energy Research and Social Science, 130, 104398.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104398


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33573
Zusammenfassung
This paper investigates media discourses on coal in South Africa to understand the state of progress of its energy transition. We approach discourse as a key element in policy sequencing, shaping the conditions under which regulatory change becomes possible. Using an integrated text-as-data pipeline, including topic modeling, named entity recognition, and sentiment analysis, we analyze approximately 8,000 national newspaper articles from 2010 to 2024. Topic modeling reveals five discourse clusters: Mining industry, Transition politics, Energy crisis, Mining affected communities, and Politics in mining and energy. While new technologies receive attention – particularly around the announcement of the Just Energy Transition Partnership with South Africa in 2021 – explicit discourse on coal phase-out remains marginal. At the same time, we highlight that these technologies are frequently framed as substitutes for structural change. Positive sentiment toward the mining sector and transition politics suggests that the transition is not framed as a coal exit. In this sense, the observed framing reveals not only media priorities but also the discursive power of dominant actors in structuring transition pathways. Our findings underscore the value of combining computational and qualitative approaches innovatively to examine socio-political transition discourses, with implications for broader applications of text-as-data in policy research. Our results inform debates on the political economy of energy transitions at the interplay of international climate finance.