English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
  Learning increases both acceptability and scrutiny of carbon dioxide removal methods: quasi-experimental evidence

Dörpmund, F., Reiner, D., Pongratz, J., Fuss, S. (2025): Learning increases both acceptability and scrutiny of carbon dioxide removal methods: quasi-experimental evidence. - Environmental Research Letters, 20, 11, 114009.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ae0b93

Item is

Files

show Files
hide Files
:
Dörpmund_2025_Environ._Res._Lett._20_114009.pdf (Publisher version), 2MB
Name:
Dörpmund_2025_Environ._Res._Lett._20_114009.pdf
Description:
-
OA-Status:
Gold
Visibility:
Public
MIME-Type / Checksum:
application/pdf / [MD5]
Technical Metadata:
Copyright Date:
-
Copyright Info:
-

Locators

show

Creators

show
hide
 Creators:
Dörpmund, Felix1, Author
Reiner, David1, Author
Pongratz, Julia1, Author
Fuss, Sabine2, Author                 
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, ou_persistent13              

Content

show
hide
Free keywords: -
 Abstract: Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies are increasingly recognized as necessary complements to decarbonization efforts; however, public acceptance remains a critical implementation challenge. This study investigates the impact of educational exposure on perceptions of CDR methods among individuals with a pre-existing interest in climate solutions. We conducted a quasi-experimental study with pre- and post-surveys of participants (n = 366 pre-survey, n = 83 post-survey, n = 29 matched pairs) enrolled in a six-week online CDR curriculum. Baseline comparisons with previous studies confirmed that participants were more knowledgeable about CDR and held more positive environmental attitudes than nationally representative population samples. Following the educational intervention, participants demonstrated significant increases in self-reported CDR knowledge and more favourable risk-benefit assessments across all CDR technologies, with the largest gains for enhanced weathering and biochar. Qualitative analysis revealed that, rather than simple endorsement, education fostered more nuanced evaluation capabilities, with participants developing greater appreciation for both benefits and method-specific limitations. Notably, participants shifted away from technology-specific preferences and towards more portfolio-based thinking, recognizing the complementary roles of different CDR approaches. These findings suggest that informed engagement with CDR technologies produces sophisticated rather than uncritical assessment frameworks, with implications for how CDR communication and engagement strategies might be designed to support constructive public dialogue about these emerging technologies.

Details

show
hide
Language(s): eng - English
 Dates: 2025-10-032025-10-03
 Publication Status: Finally published
 Pages: 11
 Publishing info: -
 Table of Contents: -
 Rev. Type: Peer
 Identifiers: DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ae0b93
MDB-ID: No data to archive
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Working Group: Sustainable Carbon Management
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: CO2 Removal
Model / method: Qualitative Methods
OATYPE: Gold Open Access
 Degree: -

Event

show

Legal Case

show

Project information

show

Source 1

show
hide
Title: Environmental Research Letters
Source Genre: Journal, SCI, Scopus, p3, oa
 Creator(s):
Affiliations:
Publ. Info: -
Pages: - Volume / Issue: 20 (11) Sequence Number: 114009 Start / End Page: - Identifier: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/150326
Publisher: IOP Publishing