日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

A Welfare Economic Approach to Planetary Boundaries

Authors

Sureth,  Michael
External Organizations;

Kalkuhl,  Matthias
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/johan.rockstrom

Rockström,  Johan
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

URL
There are no locators available
フルテキスト (公開)

28335oa.pdf
(出版社版), 3MB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Sureth, M., Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O., & Rockström, J. (2023). A Welfare Economic Approach to Planetary Boundaries. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 243(5), 477-542. doi:10.1515/jbnst-2022-0022.


引用: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28335
要旨
The crises of both the climate and the biosphere are manifestations of the imbalance between human extractive, and polluting activities and the Earth’s regenerative capacity. Planetary boundaries define limits for biophysical systems and processes that regulate the stability and life support capacity of the Earth system, and thereby also define a safe operating space for humanity on Earth. Budgets associated to planetary boundaries can be understood as global commons: common pool resources that can be utilized within finite limits. Despite the analytical interpretation of planetary boundaries as global commons, the planetary boundaries framework is missing a thorough integration into economic theory. We aim to bridge the gap between welfare economic theory and planetary boundaries as derived in the natural sciences by presenting a unified theory of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis. Our pragmatic approach aims to overcome shortcomings of the practical applications of CEA and CBA to environmental problems of a planetary scale. To do so, we develop a model framework and explore decision paradigms that give guidance to setting limits on human activities. This conceptual framework is then applied to planetary boundaries. We conclude by using the realized insights to derive a research agenda that builds on the understanding of planetary boundaries as global commons