Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Comparison of Embodied Carbon of 3D-printed vs. Conventionally Built Houses

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/costanza.rossi

Rossi,  Costanza
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/fabian.reitemeyer

Reitemeyer,  Fabian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Heidrich,  Oliver
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Diego.Rybski

Rybski,  Diego
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

28899oa.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 354KB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)

RossiC_Dipl_2022.pdf
(Ergänzendes Material), 3MB

Zitation

Rossi, C., Reitemeyer, F., Heidrich, O., Rybski, D. (2024): Comparison of Embodied Carbon of 3D-printed vs. Conventionally Built Houses. - Findings, 89707.
https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.89707


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28899
Zusammenfassung
The construction sector makes a considerable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. Considering the ongoing urbanization trends and climate change urgency, the exploration of alter- native construction techniques should be a mandate. 3D-printing represents an emergent technol- ogy and more and more specimen are being built. We collect data of raw material use for houses that have already been built using 3D-printing. Assessing the construction related emissions, we find that, the four examples for which we could obtain the data, do have less emissions per square meter than conventionally built houses (10 international examples). We argue that 3D-printing represents an interesting alternative, but further research is necessary, not just in terms of environ- mental implications but also to better understand the social implications, e.g. health and safety or labor.