English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Comparison of Embodied Carbon of 3D-printed vs. Conventionally Built Houses

Authors
/persons/resource/costanza.rossi

Rossi,  Costanza
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/fabian.reitemeyer

Reitemeyer,  Fabian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Heidrich,  Oliver
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Diego.Rybski

Rybski,  Diego
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

28899oa.pdf
(Publisher version), 354KB

Supplementary Material (public)

RossiC_Dipl_2022.pdf
(Supplementary material), 3MB

Citation

Rossi, C., Reitemeyer, F., Heidrich, O., Rybski, D. (2024): Comparison of Embodied Carbon of 3D-printed vs. Conventionally Built Houses. - Findings, 89707.
https://doi.org/10.32866/001c.89707


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_28899
Abstract
The construction sector makes a considerable contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions.
Considering the ongoing urbanization trends and climate change urgency, the exploration of alter-
native construction techniques should be a mandate. 3D-printing represents an emergent technol-
ogy and more and more specimen are being built. We collect data of raw material use for houses
that have already been built using 3D-printing. Assessing the construction related emissions, we
find that, the four examples for which we could obtain the data, do have less emissions per square
meter than conventionally built houses (10 international examples). We argue that 3D-printing
represents an interesting alternative, but further research is necessary, not just in terms of environ-
mental implications but also to better understand the social implications, e.g. health and safety or
labor.