English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing

Authors

Döbbeling-Hildebrandt,  Niklas
External Organizations;

Miersch,  Klaas
External Organizations;

Khanna,  Tarun M.
External Organizations;

Bachelet,  Marion
External Organizations;

Bruns,  Stephan B.
External Organizations;

Callaghan,  Max
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Flachsland,  Christian
External Organizations;

Forster,  Piers M.
External Organizations;

Kalkuhl,  Matthias
External Organizations;

Koch,  Nicolas
External Organizations;

Lamb,  William F.
External Organizations;

Ohlendorf,  Nils
External Organizations;

Steckel,  Jan Christoph
External Organizations;

Minx,  Jan C.
External Organizations;

External Ressource
Fulltext (public)

s41467-024-48512-w.pdf
(Any fulltext), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Döbbeling-Hildebrandt, N., Miersch, K., Khanna, T. M., Bachelet, M., Bruns, S. B., Callaghan, M., Edenhofer, O., Flachsland, C., Forster, P. M., Kalkuhl, M., Koch, N., Lamb, W. F., Ohlendorf, N., Steckel, J. C., Minx, J. C. (2024): Systematic review and meta-analysis of ex-post evaluations on the effectiveness of carbon pricing. - Nature Communications, 15, 4147.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-48512-w


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_29901
Abstract
Today, more than 70 carbon pricing schemes have been implemented around the globe, but their contributions to emissions reductions remains a subject of heated debate in science and policy. Here we assess the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing emissions using a rigorous, machine-learning assisted systematic review and meta-analysis. Based on 483 effect sizes extracted from 80 causal ex-post evaluations across 21 carbon pricing schemes, we find that introducing a carbon price has yielded immediate and substantial emission reductions for at least 17 of these policies, despite the low level of prices in most instances. Statistically significant emissions reductions range between –5% to –21% across the schemes (–4% to –15% after correcting for publication bias). Our study highlights critical evidence gaps with regard to dozens of unevaluated carbon pricing schemes and the price elasticity of emissions reductions. More rigorous synthesis of carbon pricing and other climate policies is required across a range of outcomes to advance our understanding of “what works” and accelerate learning on climate solutions in science and policy.