Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Bericht

Emissions Trading with Clean-up Certificates: Deterring Mitigation or Increasing Ambition?

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/Kai.Lessmann

Lessmann,  Kai
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/friedemann.gruner

Gruner,  Friedemann
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/kalkuhl

Kalkuhl,  Matthias
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PIKpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Lessmann, K., Gruner, F., Kalkuhl, M., Edenhofer, O. (2024): Emissions Trading with Clean-up Certificates: Deterring Mitigation or Increasing Ambition?, (CEPA Discussion Papers ; 79), Potsdam : University of Potsdam, Center for Economic Policy Analysis, 37 p.
https://doi.org/10.25932/publishup-64136


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_29994
Zusammenfassung
We analyze how conventional emissions trading schemes (ETS) can be modified by introducing “clean-up certificates” to allow for a phase of net-negative emissions. Clean-up certificates bundle the permission to emit CO2 with the obligation for its removal. We show that demand for such certificates is determined by cost-saving technological progress, the discount rate and the length of the compliance period. Introducing extra clean-up certificates into an existing ETS reduces near-term carbon prices and mitigation efforts. In contrast, substituting ETS allowances with clean-up certificates reduces cumulative emissions without depressing carbon prices or mitigation in the near term. We calibrate our model to the EU ETS and identify reforms where simultaneously (i) ambition levels rise, (ii) climate damages fall, (iii) revenues from carbon prices rise and (iv) carbon prices and aggregate mitigation cost fall. For reducing climate damages, roughly half of the issued clean-up certificates should replace conventional ETS allowances. In the context of the EU ETS, a European Carbon Central Bank could manage the implementation of cleanup certificates and could serve as an enforcement mechanism.