Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Is capital back? The role of land ownership and savings behavior

Urheber*innen
/persons/resource/franks

Franks,  R. Maximilian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Klenert,  D.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/anselm.schultes

Schultes,  Anselm
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Kai.Lessmann

Lessmann,  Kai
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

22333oa.pdf
(Postprint), 5MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Franks, R. M., Klenert, D., Schultes, A., Lessmann, K., Edenhofer, O. (2018): Is capital back? The role of land ownership and savings behavior. - International Tax and Public Finance, 25, 5, 1252-1276.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-018-9486-3


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_22333
Zusammenfassung
Wealth inequality is a major political concern in most OECD countries. Under this premise, we analyze different policy instruments in terms of their impact on wealth inequality and output. In a general equilibrium model, we disaggregate wealth in its capital and land components, and savings in their life-cycle and bequest components. Households are heterogeneous in their taste for leaving bequests. We show that governments have considerable freedom in reducing wealth inequality without sacrificing output: Land rent taxes enhance output due to a portfolio effect and reduce wealth inequality slightly. Bequest taxes have the highest potential to reduce inequality, and their effect on output is moderate. By contrast, we confirm the standard result that capital taxes reduce output strongly and show that they only have moderate redistributive effects. Furthermore, we find that using the tax proceeds for transfers to the young generations enhances output the most and further reduces wealth inequality.