Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Implications of climate change mitigation strategies on international bioenergy trade

Urheber*innen

Daioglou,  Vassilis
External Organizations;

Muratori,  Matteo
External Organizations;

Lamers,  Patrick
External Organizations;

Fujimori,  Shinichiro
External Organizations;

Kitous,  Alban
External Organizations;

Köberle,  Alexandre C.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Nicolas.Bauer

Bauer,  Nicolas
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Junginger,  Martin
External Organizations;

Kato,  Etsushi
External Organizations;

Leblanc,  Florian
External Organizations;

Mima,  Silvana
External Organizations;

Wise,  Marshal
External Organizations;

van Vuuren,  Detlef P.
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)

24781oa.pdf
(Verlagsversion), 2MB

Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Daioglou, V., Muratori, M., Lamers, P., Fujimori, S., Kitous, A., Köberle, A. C., Bauer, N., Junginger, M., Kato, E., Leblanc, F., Mima, S., Wise, M., van Vuuren, D. P. (2020): Implications of climate change mitigation strategies on international bioenergy trade. - Climatic Change, 163, 3, 1639-1658.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02877-1


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_24781
Zusammenfassung
Most climate change mitigation scenarios rely on increased use of bioenergy to decarbonize the energy system. Here we use results from the 33rd Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF-33) to investigate projected international bioenergy trade for different integrated assessment models across several climate change mitigation scenarios. Results show that in scenarios with no climate policy, international bioenergy trade is likely to increase over time, and becomes even more important when climate targets are set. More stringent climate targets, however, do not necessarily imply greater bioenergy trade compared to weaker targets, as final energy demand may be reduced. However, the scaling up of bioenergy trade happens sooner and at a faster rate with increasing climate target stringency. Across models, for a scenario likely to achieve a 2 °C target, 10–45 EJ/year out of a total global bioenergy consumption of 72–214 EJ/year are expected to be traded across nine world regions by 2050. While this projection is greater than the present trade volumes of coal or natural gas, it remains below the present trade of crude oil. This growth in bioenergy trade largely replaces the trade in fossil fuels (especially oil) which is projected to decrease significantly over the twenty-first century. As climate change mitigation scenarios often show diversified energy systems, in which numerous world regions can act as bioenergy suppliers, the projections do not necessarily lead to energy security concerns. Nonetheless, rapid growth in the trade of bioenergy is projected in strict climate mitigation scenarios, raising questions about infrastructure, logistics, financing options, and global standards for bioenergy production and trade.