???ENUM_LANGUAGE_JA???
 
???mainMenu_lnkPrivacyPolicy??? ???mainMenu_lnkPolicy???

???ViewItemPage???


???ENUM_STATE_RELEASED???

???ENUM_GENRE_ARTICLE???

Accounting for structural transformation in the U.S.

???ViewItemOverview_lblSpecificAuthorsSection???
/persons/resource/marcolino

Marcolino,  Marcos Araujo
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

???ViewItemOverview_lblExternalResourceSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noExternalResourcesAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblRestrictedFulltextSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noRestrictedFullTextsAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblFulltextSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noFullTextsAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblSupplementaryMaterialSection???
???ViewItemOverview_noSupplementaryMaterialAvailable???
???ViewItemOverview_lblCitationSection???

Marcolino, M. A. (2022): Accounting for structural transformation in the U.S. - Journal of Macroeconomics, 71, 103394.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2021.103394


???ViewItemOverview_lblCiteAs???: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_26875
???ViewItemOverview_lblAbstractSection???
I account for the sources of labor reallocation from the manufacturing sector towards services in the United States for the 1950 to 2010 period. I use a multi-sector model with sector-specific productivity growth and non-homothetic preferences to decompose the sources of labor reallocation into supply-side, demand-side, and wedge distortions. The decomposition is performed in the context of a competitive economy where the competitive equilibrium with wedges reproduces prices and quantities of the economy exactly. During the 1950–2010 period, the demand-side mechanism accounts for 57% of the reallocation of labor and the supply-side for 28%. Focusing only in the sub-period from 1950 to 1980, 70% of the reallocation is demand-driven. In the sub-period between 1980 and 2010, the three sources of labor reallocation are quantitatively important. Demand-side accounts for 47%, supply-side for 42% and wedge distortions for 10%.