Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  The political economy of coal across 12 countries: Analysing qualitative interviews with topic models

Manych, N., Müller-Hansen, F., Steckel, J. C. (2023): The political economy of coal across 12 countries: Analysing qualitative interviews with topic models. - Energy Research and Social Science, 101, 103137.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103137

Item is

Dateien

einblenden: Dateien
ausblenden: Dateien
:
29422oa.pdf (Postprint), 3MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
29422oa.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat (Embargo bis 2024-06-01)
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-
:
Manych2023_SI_final.pdf (Ergänzendes Material), 2MB
 
Datei-Permalink:
-
Name:
Manych2023_SI_final.pdf
Beschreibung:
-
Sichtbarkeit:
Privat (Embargo bis 2024-06-01)
MIME-Typ / Prüfsumme:
application/pdf
Technische Metadaten:
Copyright Datum:
-
Copyright Info:
-
Lizenz:
-

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Manych, Niccolò1, Autor
Müller-Hansen, Finn2, Autor              
Steckel, Jan Christoph2, Autor              
Affiliations:
1External Organizations, ou_persistent22              
2Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Understanding the ongoing investments in coal-fired power plants requires an analysis of the political economy. Here, we conduct a computational analysis of 212 interviews from 12 countries on the political economy of coal using topic modelling (TM). Our study highlights relevant topics by actor group and country. While most topics are similarly distributed across all actor groups, we find distinct clusters of countries in which similar topics play important roles. For example, in Indonesia and India, sustaining low electricity tariffs is brought forward as a reason to invest in coal, whereas in South Africa and Kenya the civil society is considered instrumental in the choice of coal or alternatives. To validate our findings, we compare them to outcomes of qualitative case studies and to papers grouping countries based on quantifiable factors. As this study is among the first to apply TM to interview data, we thereby highlight strengths and challenges for such application and the interpretability of results. We argue that topic models are effective supplements to qualitative case studies, particularly when analysing large amounts of text.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2022-11-232023-05-092023-05-262023-07
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103137
MDB-ID: No data to archive
Organisational keyword: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
PIKDOMAIN: RD3 - Transformation Pathways
Model / method: Qualitative Methods
Regional keyword: Global
Research topic keyword: Energy
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Energy Research and Social Science
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 101 Artikelnummer: 103137 Start- / Endseite: - Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/energy-research-social-science
Publisher: Elsevier