English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

The economic commitment of climate change

Authors
/persons/resource/Maximilian.Kotz

Kotz,  Maximilian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Levermann

Levermann,  Anders
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Leonie.Wenz

Wenz,  Leonie
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10562951
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (public)

Kotz_2024_s41586-024-07219-0.pdf
(Publisher version), 9MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Kotz, M., Levermann, A., Wenz, L. (2024): The economic commitment of climate change. - Nature, 628, 551-557.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07219-0


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_29915
Abstract
Global projections of macroeconomic climate-change damages typically consider impacts from average annual and national temperatures over long time horizons. Here we use recent empirical findings from more than 1,600 regions worldwide over the past 40 years to project sub-national damages from temperature and precipitation, including daily variability and extremes. Using an empirical approach that provides a robust lower bound on the persistence of impacts on economic growth, we find that the world economy is committed to an income reduction of 19% within the next 26 years independent of future emission choices (relative to a baseline without climate impacts, likely range of 11–29% accounting for physical climate and empirical uncertainty). These damages already outweigh the mitigation costs required to limit global warming to 2 °C by sixfold over this near-term time frame and thereafter diverge strongly dependent on emission choices. Committed damages arise predominantly through changes in average temperature, but accounting for further climatic components raises estimates by approximately 50% and leads to stronger regional heterogeneity. Committed losses are projected for all regions except those at very high latitudes, at which reductions in temperature variability bring benefits. The largest losses are committed at lower latitudes in regions with lower cumulative historical emissions and lower present-day income.