日本語
 
Privacy Policy ポリシー/免責事項
  詳細検索ブラウズ

アイテム詳細


公開

学術論文

Convolution of individual and group identity: self-reliance increases polarisation in basic opinion model

Authors
/persons/resource/Lennart.Quante

Quante,  Lennart
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Stechemesser

Stechemesser,  Annika
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Hödtke,  Damian
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Levermann

Levermann,  Anders
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

フルテキスト (公開)

29982oa.pdf
(出版社版), 2MB

付随資料 (公開)
There is no public supplementary material available
引用

Quante, L., Stechemesser, A., Hödtke, D., & Levermann, A. (2024). Convolution of individual and group identity: self-reliance increases polarisation in basic opinion model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11:. doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03359-w.


引用: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_29982
要旨
Opinion formation within society follows complex dynamics. Towards its understanding, axiomatic theory can complement data analysis. To this end we propose an axiomatic model of opinion formation that aims to capture the interaction of individual conviction with social influence in a minimalist fashion. Despite only representing that (1) agents have an initial conviction with respect to a topic and are (2) influenced by their neighbours, the model shows emergence of opinion clusters from an initially unstructured state. Here, we show that increasing individual self-reliance makes agents more likely to align their socially influenced opinion with their inner conviction which concomitantly leads to increased polarisation. The opinion drift observed with increasing self-reliance may be a plausible analogue of polarisation trends in the real world. Modelling the basic traits of striving for individual versus group identity, we find a trade-off between individual fulfilment and societal cohesion. This finding from fundamental assumptions can serve as a building block to explain opinion polarisation.