English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  DetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

A just world on a safe planet: a Lancet Planetary Health–Earth Commission report on Earth-system boundaries, translations, and transformations

Authors

Gupta,  Joyeeta
External Organizations;

Bai,  Xuemei
External Organizations;

Liverman,  Diana M
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/johan.rockstrom

Rockström,  Johan
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Qin,  Dahe
External Organizations;

Stewart-Koster,  Ben
External Organizations;

Rocha,  Juan C
External Organizations;

Jacobson,  Lisa
External Organizations;

Abrams,  Jesse F
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/andersen

Andersen,  Lauren
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Armstrong McKay,  David I
External Organizations;

Bala,  Govindasamy
External Organizations;

Bunn,  Stuart E
External Organizations;

Ciobanu,  Daniel
External Organizations;

DeClerck,  Fabrice
External Organizations;

Ebi,  Kristie L
External Organizations;

Gifford,  Lauren
External Organizations;

Gordon,  Christopher
External Organizations;

Hasan,  Syezlin
External Organizations;

Kanie,  Norichika
External Organizations;

Lenton,  Timothy M
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/sina.loriani

Loriani,  Sina
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Mohamed,  Awaz
External Organizations;

Nakicenovic,  Nebojsa
External Organizations;

Obura,  David
External Organizations;

Ospina,  Daniel
External Organizations;

Prodani,  Klaudia
External Organizations;

Rammelt,  Crelis
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Boris.Sakschewski

Sakschewski,  Boris
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Scholtens,  Joeri
External Organizations;

Tharammal,  Thejna
External Organizations;

van Vuuren,  Detlef
External Organizations;

Verburg,  Peter H
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ricarda.Winkelmann

Winkelmann,  Ricarda
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Zimm,  Caroline
External Organizations;

Bennett,  Elena
External Organizations;

Bjørn,  Anders
External Organizations;

Bringezu,  Stefan
External Organizations;

Broadgate,  Wendy J
External Organizations;

Bulkeley,  Harriet
External Organizations;

Crona,  Beatrice
External Organizations;

Green,  Pamela A
External Organizations;

Hoff,  Holger
External Organizations;

Huang,  Lei
External Organizations;

Hurlbert,  Margot
External Organizations;

Inoue,  Cristina Y A
External Organizations;

Kılkış,  Şiir
External Organizations;

Lade,  Steven J
External Organizations;

Liu,  Jianguo
External Organizations;

Nadeem,  Imran
External Organizations;

Ndehedehe,  Christopher
External Organizations;

Okereke,  Chukwumerije
External Organizations;

Otto,  Ilona M
External Organizations;

Pedde,  Simona
External Organizations;

Pereira,  Laura
External Organizations;

Schulte-Uebbing,  Lena
External Organizations;

Tàbara,  J David
External Organizations;

de Vries,  Wim
External Organizations;

Whiteman,  Gail
External Organizations;

Xiao,  Cunde
External Organizations;

Xu,  Xinwu
External Organizations;

Zafra-Calvo,  Noelia
External Organizations;

Zhang,  Xin
External Organizations;

Fezzigna,  Paola
External Organizations;

Gentile,  Giuliana
External Organizations;

External Ressource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (public)
There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Gupta, J., Bai, X., Liverman, D. M., Rockström, J., Qin, D., Stewart-Koster, B., Rocha, J. C., Jacobson, L., Abrams, J. F., Andersen, L., Armstrong McKay, D. I., Bala, G., Bunn, S. E., Ciobanu, D., DeClerck, F., Ebi, K. L., Gifford, L., Gordon, C., Hasan, S., Kanie, N., Lenton, T. M., Loriani, S., Mohamed, A., Nakicenovic, N., Obura, D., Ospina, D., Prodani, K., Rammelt, C., Sakschewski, B., Scholtens, J., Tharammal, T., van Vuuren, D., Verburg, P. H., Winkelmann, R., Zimm, C., Bennett, E., Bjørn, A., Bringezu, S., Broadgate, W. J., Bulkeley, H., Crona, B., Green, P. A., Hoff, H., Huang, L., Hurlbert, M., Inoue, C. Y. A., Kılkış, Ş., Lade, S. J., Liu, J., Nadeem, I., Ndehedehe, C., Okereke, C., Otto, I. M., Pedde, S., Pereira, L., Schulte-Uebbing, L., Tàbara, J. D., de Vries, W., Whiteman, G., Xiao, C., Xu, X., Zafra-Calvo, N., Zhang, X., Fezzigna, P., Gentile, G. (2024 online): A just world on a safe planet: a Lancet Planetary Health–Earth Commission report on Earth-system boundaries, translations, and transformations. - The Lancet Planetary Health.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00042-1


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_30220
Abstract
The health of the planet and its people are at risk. The deterioration of the global commons—ie, the natural systems that support life on Earth—is exacerbating energy, food, and water insecurity, and increasing the risk of disease, disaster, displacement, and conflict. In this Commission, we quantify safe and just Earth-system boundaries (ESBs) and assess minimum access to natural resources required for human dignity and to enable escape from poverty. Collectively, these describe a safe and just corridor that is essential to ensuring sustainable and resilient human and planetary health and thriving in the Anthropocene. We then discuss the need for translation of ESBs across scales to inform science-based targets for action by key actors (and the challenges in doing so), and conclude by identifying the system transformations necessary to bring about a safe and just future. Our concept of the safe and just corridor advances research on planetary boundaries and the justice and Earth-system aspects of the Sustainable Development Goals. We define safe as ensuring the biophysical stability of the Earth system, and our justice principles include minimising harm, meeting minimum access needs, and redistributing resources and responsibilities to enhance human health and wellbeing. The ceiling of the safe and just corridor is defined by the more stringent of the safe and just ESBs to minimise significant harm and ensure Earth-system stability. The base of the corridor is defined by the impacts of minimum global access to food, water, energy, and infrastructure for the global population, in the domains of the variables for which we defined the ESBs. Living within the corridor is necessary, because exceeding the ESBs and not meeting basic needs threatens human health and life on Earth. However, simply staying within the corridor does not guarantee justice because within the corridor resources can also be inequitably distributed, aggravating human health and causing environmental damage. Procedural and substantive justice are necessary to ensure that the space within the corridor is justly shared. We define eight safe and just ESBs for five domains—the biosphere (functional integrity and natural ecosystem area), climate, nutrient cycles (phosphorus and nitrogen), freshwater (surface and groundwater), and aerosols—to reduce the risk of degrading biophysical life-support systems and avoid tipping points. Seven of the ESBs have already been transgressed: functional integrity, natural ecosystem area, climate, phosphorus, nitrogen, surface water, and groundwater. The eighth ESB, air pollution, has been transgressed at the local level in many parts of the world. Although safe boundaries would ensure Earth-system stability and thus safeguard the overall biophysical conditions that have enabled humans to flourish, they do not necessarily safeguard everyone against harm or allow for minimum access to resources for all. We use the concept of Earth-system justice—which seeks to ensure wellbeing and reduce harm within and across generations, nations, and communities, and between humans and other species, through procedural and distributive justice—to assess safe boundaries. Earth-system justice recognises unequal responsibility for, and unequal exposure and vulnerability to, Earth-system changes, and also recognises unequal capacities to respond and unequal access to resources. We also assess the extent to which safe ESBs could minimise irreversible, existential, and other major harms to human health and wellbeing through a review of who is affected at each boundary. Not all safe ESBs are just, in that they do not minimise all significant harm (eg, that associated with the climate change, aerosol, or nitrogen ESBs). Billions of people globally do not have sufficient access to energy, clean water, food, and other resources. For climate change, for example, tens of millions of people are harmed at lower levels of warming than that defined in the safe ESB, and thus to avoid significant harm would require a more stringent ESB. In other domains, the safe ESBs align with the just ESBs, although some need to be modified, or complemented with local standards, to prevent significant harm (eg, the aerosols ESB). We examine the implications of achieving the social SDGs in 2018 through an impact modelling exercise, and quantify the minimum access to resources required for basic human dignity (level 1) as well as the minimum resources required to enable escape from poverty (level 2). We conclude that without social transformation and redistribution of natural resource use (eg, from top consumers of natural resources to those who currently do not have minimum access to these resources), meeting minimum-access levels for people living below the minimum level would increase pressures on the Earth system and the risks of further transgressions of the ESBs. We also estimate resource-access needs for human populations in 2050 and the associated Earth-system impacts these could have. We project that the safe and just climate ESB will be overshot by 2050, even if everybody in the world lives with only the minimum required access to resources (no more, no less), unless there are transformations of, for example, the energy and food systems. Thus, a safe and just corridor will only be possible with radical societal transformations and technological changes. Living within the safe and just corridor requires operationalisation of ESBs by key actors across all levels, which can be achieved via cross-scale translation (whereby resources and responsibilities for impact reductions are equitably shared among actors). We focus on cities and businesses because of the magnitude of their impacts on the Earth system, and their potential to take swift action and act as agents of change. We explore possible approaches for translating each ESB to cities and businesses via the sequential steps of transcription, allocation, and adjustment. We highlight how different elements of Earth-system justice can be reflected in the allocation and adjustment steps by choosing appropriate sharing approaches, informed by the governance context and broader enabling conditions. Finally we discuss system transformations that could move humanity into a safe and just corridor and reduce risks of instability, injustice, and harm to human health. These transformations aim to minimise harm and ensure access to essential resources, while addressing the drivers of Earth-system change and vulnerability and the institutional and social barriers to systemic transformations, and include reducing and reallocating consumption, changing economic systems, technology, and governance.