English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT
Add to Basket
  Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released
Journal Article

Advancing life cycle assessment of bioenergy crops with global land use models

Authors

Arvesen,  Anders
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Florian.Humpenoeder

Humpenöder,  Florian
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Navarrete Gutiérrez,  Tomás
External Organizations;

Gibon,  Thomas
External Organizations;

Baustert,  Paul
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Jan.Dietrich

Dietrich,  Jan Philipp
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Stadler,  Konstantin
External Organizations;

Iordan,  Cristina Maria
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Gunnar.Luderer

Luderer,  Gunnar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Alexander.Popp

Popp,  Alexander
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Cherubini,  Francesco
External Organizations;

External Ressource

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1418752
(Supplementary material)

Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Arvesen, A., Humpenöder, F., Navarrete Gutiérrez, T., Gibon, T., Baustert, P., Dietrich, J. P., Stadler, K., Iordan, C. M., Luderer, G., Popp, A., Cherubini, F. (2024 online): Advancing life cycle assessment of bioenergy crops with global land use models. - Environmental Research Communications.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad97ac


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_30704
Abstract
Bioenergy crops can cut greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, yet often bring hard-to-quantify environmental impacts. We present an approach for integrating global land use modeling into life cycle assessment (LCA) to estimate effects of bioenergy crops. The approach involves methodological choices connected to time horizons, scenarios of GHG prices and socioeconomic pathways, and flexible data transfer between models. Land-use change emissions are treated as totals, avoiding uncertain separation into direct and indirect emissions. The land use model MAgPIE is used to generate scenarios up to 2070 of land use, GHG emissions, irrigation and fertilizer use with different scales of perennial grass bioenergy crop deployment. We find that land use-related CO2 emission for bioenergy range from 2 to 35 tonne TJ-1, depending on bioenergy demand, policy context, year and accounting method. GHG emissions per unit of bioenergy do not increase with bioenergy demand in presence of an emission tax. With a GHG price of 40 or 200 $ tonne-1 CO2, GHG per bioenergy remain similar if the demand is doubled. A carbon tax thus has a stronger effect on emissions than bioenergy demand. These findings suggest that even a relatively moderate GHG price (40 $ tonne-1 CO2) can prevent significant emissions, highlighting the critical role governance plays in securing the climate benefits of bioenergy. However, realizing these benefits in practice will depend on a coherent policy framework for pricing CO2 emissions from land-use change, which is currently absent. Overall, our approach addresses direct and indirect effects associated with irrigation, machinery fuel and fertilizer use as well as emissions. Thanks to a global spatial coverage and temporal dimension, it facilitates a systematic and consistent inclusion of indirect effects in a global analysis framework. Future research can build on our open-source data/software to study different regions, bioenergy products or impacts.