Trade-offs among human, animal, and environmental health hinder the uniform 
progress of global One Health

Tian, Ya; Zhang, Junze; Li, Zonghan; Wu, Kai; Cao, Min; Lin, Jian; Pradhan, Prajal; Lai, Shengjie; Meng, Jia; Fu, Bojie; Chen, Min; Lin, Hui

doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111357

アイテム詳細

登録内容を編集ファイル形式で保存

一時保存へ追加

タグ情報を表示リリース履歴を表示詳細要約

公開

学術論文

Trade-offs among human, animal, and environmental health hinder the uniform progress of global One Health

Authors

Tian, Ya
External Organizations;

Zhang, Junze
External Organizations;

Li, Zonghan
External Organizations;

Wu, Kai
External Organizations;

Cao, Min
External Organizations;

Lin, Jian
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/prajal.pradhan

Pradhan, Prajal
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Lai, Shengjie
External Organizations;

Meng, Jia
External Organizations;

Fu, Bojie
External Organizations;

Chen, Min
External Organizations;

Lin, Hui
External Organizations;

URL

There are no locators available

フルテキスト (公開)

1-s2.0-S2589004224025823-main.pdf
(出版社版), 7MB

付随資料 (公開)

There is no public supplementary material available

引用

Tian, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Z., Wu, K., Cao, M., Lin, J., Pradhan, P., Lai, S., Meng, J., Fu, B., Chen, M., & Lin, H. (2024). Trade-offs among human, animal, and environmental health hinder the uniform progress of global One Health. iScience, 27(12):. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111357.

引用: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_31330

要旨

The One Health (OH) approach, integrating aspects of human, animal, and environmental health, still lacks robustly quantified insights into its complex relationships. To fill this knowledge gap, we devised a comprehensive assessment scheme for OH to assess its progress, synergies, trade-offs, and priority targets. From 2000 to 2020, we find evidence for global progress toward OH, albeit uneven, with its average score rising from 61.6 to 65.5, driven primarily by better human health although environmental health lags. Despite synergies prevalent within and between the three health dimensions, over half of the world’s countries, mainly low-income ones, still incur substantial trade-offs impeding OH’s advancement, especially between animal and environmental health. Our in-depth analysis of synergy and trade-off networks reveals that maternal, newborn, and child health are critical synergistic targets, whereas biodiversity and land resources dominate trade-offs. We provide key information for the synergetic and uniform development of global OH and policymaking.