English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Technology, geography and collaboration networks: assessing global innovation and research funding patterns for carbon removal

Authors
/persons/resource/mhansen

Müller-Hansen,  Finn       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Fritz,  Livia
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/sarah.lueck

Lück,  Sarah       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Sovacool,  Benjamin K.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jan.minx

Minx,  Jan C.       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)
Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Müller-Hansen, F., Fritz, L., Lück, S., Sovacool, B. K., Minx, J. C. (2025): Technology, geography and collaboration networks: assessing global innovation and research funding patterns for carbon removal. - Environmental Research Communications, 7, 9, 095008.
https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae0099


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_33853
Abstract
In addition to strong global emission cuts, experts see the rapid upscaling of carbon dioxide removal
(CDR) as paramount for reaching the Paris agreement target. A comprehensive view of research and
innovation dynamics is crucial for the rigorous assessment of the potentials of CDR options and for
guiding strategies to close knowledge gaps. Here, we investigate funding patterns in CDR research
across time, geographies and fields of research and identify key organizations and actors in
collaboration networks. We use comprehensive search queries and machine learning to identify more
than 6000 research grants on twelve different CDR options. Research funding increased strongly over
the past 30 years (21% p.a.), more than funding for climate science and technology. In comparison to
carbon capture and storage, CDR receives a higher number of grants, but less total funding, estimated
at 4.2 bn$. Funding is highly concentrated in Europe and North America and mostly directed towards
natural, engineering and agricultural science, with little but increasing support for social science.
European funding seems to encourage research in larger consortia. However, our analysis finds little
funding specifically targeted at CDR, highlighting potentials for strategic initiatives for accelerating
innovation in CDR.