English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Impact pathways of a homestead food production programme on women’s dietary diversity in Bangladesh

Authors
/persons/resource/Nathalie.Lambrecht

Lambrecht,  Nathalie       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;
Submitting Corresponding Author, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Sparling,  Thalia M.
External Organizations;

Mayer,  Axel
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/waid

Waid,  Jillian Lee       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

/persons/resource/Amanda.Wendt

Wendt,  Amanda       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Ali,  Masum
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/gabrysch

Gabrysch,  Sabine       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s43016-026-01354-9.pdf
(Publisher version), 2MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Lambrecht, N., Sparling, T. M., Mayer, A., Waid, J. L., Wendt, A., Ali, M., Gabrysch, S. (2026): Impact pathways of a homestead food production programme on women’s dietary diversity in Bangladesh. - Nature Food, 7, 464-473.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01354-9


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34473
Abstract
Homestead food production (HFP) can improve nutrition through multiple pathways. Understanding their relative importance can optimize intervention design and impact. Here we used panel data on 2,612 women from a 1:1 cluster-randomized trial of 96 settlements in rural Bangladesh and conducted multiple mediation analysis to investigate the impact pathways of a 3-year HFP intervention on women’s dietary diversity. The pathways analysed fully explained the intervention’s total effect on dietary diversity score, amounting to an increase of 0.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3–0.5) food groups on a 10-point scale. Garden production accounted for 78% of the increase (β = 0.33 (95% CI 0.25–0.42)), emerging as the key component to improving dietary diversity. Nutrition knowledge accounted for 18% of the increase, while poultry production and market activity made smaller contributions. These findings can guide the design of future HFP interventions, but similar analyses are needed across a range of interventions, outcomes and settings to build a robust evidence base for improving nutrition.