English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Hydrological regimes and drainage systems of aerial rivers across South America

Authors

Weng,  Wei
External Organizations;

Fu,  Ping
External Organizations;

Hung,  Ho Tin
External Organizations;

Tseng,  Kai-Chih
External Organizations;

Wang,  Li-Pen
External Organizations;

Hsu,  Yun-Man
External Organizations;

Lo,  Min-Hui
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/luis.costa

Costa,  Luís       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Dubreuil,  Vincent
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

s41467-026-76303-y.pdf
(Publisher version), 3MB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Weng, W., Fu, P., Hung, H. T., Tseng, K.-C., Wang, L.-P., Hsu, Y.-M., Lo, M.-H., Costa, L., Dubreuil, V. (2026): Hydrological regimes and drainage systems of aerial rivers across South America. - Nature Communications, 17, 9341.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76303-y


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_34936
Abstract
Aerial rivers, long-term preferential pathways of atmospheric moisture flows, sustain ecosystems and regional hydrology. Maximizing their downwind discharge potential remains elusive without an objective way to identify critical upwind source regions. Here we analyze the drainage patterns of aerial rivers across South America and develop a mathematical method to identify turning points in moisture drainage curves, beyond which the intensity of upwind moisture contribution declines sharply. This provides a criterion for objectively delineating critical upwind basins and reveals pronounced continental variation in their spatial extent. These patterns reflect distinct regimes within the continental aerial river system, enabling its classification into four major drainage types: headwater, drainage, outfall, and plain areas. The four types differ in their potential for atmospheric moisture management and in their susceptibility to ecological tipping points, with implications for refining forest conservation priorities. Together, these findings support more effective land-water planning and moisture governance under a changing climate.