English
 
Privacy Policy Disclaimer
  Advanced SearchBrowse

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Released

Journal Article

Governing artificial intelligence for planetary health

Authors
/persons/resource/Felix.Creutzig

Creutzig,  Felix       
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Denton,  Fatima
External Organizations;

Hine,  Emmie
External Organizations;

Joshi,  Somya
External Organizations;

Ke,  Gong
External Organizations;

Kyrychenko,  Yara
External Organizations;

Lan,  Xue
External Organizations;

Messner,  Dirk
External Organizations;

O’Neill,  Daniel W.
External Organizations;

External Resource
No external resources are shared
Fulltext (restricted access)
There are currently no full texts shared for your IP range.
Fulltext (public)

1-s2.0-S2542519625002876-main.pdf
(Publisher version), 450KB

Supplementary Material (public)
There is no public supplementary material available
Citation

Creutzig, F., Denton, F., Hine, E., Joshi, S., Ke, G., Kyrychenko, Y., Lan, X., Messner, D., O’Neill, D. W. (2026): Governing artificial intelligence for planetary health. - The Lancet Planetary Health, 10, 3, 101408.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101408


Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_35072
Abstract
Establishing global governance of artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming an increasingly pressing challenge to ensure the provision of global public goods and to mitigate harmful effects on societies and the planet. Current debates around AI take various forms, follow diverse narratives, and centre variously on economic, social, environmental, or safety aspects. Here, we make three contributions. First, we classify risks and challenges of AI across the social, planetary, and safety domains. Second, we show that AI should be governed as a global commons, requiring coordinated interventions across all three domains, reflecting relevant inter-domain feedback loops, and root drivers, such as the pursuit of monopolistic AI power and the AI-infused media environment. Third, we identify data, energy, and compute as relevant regulatory dimensions across social, planetary, and safety domains. We conclude by emphasising the importance of limiting agentic AI, incentivising depolarising algorithms on social media, and setting AI dynamics within the context of global equity.