Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT

Freigegeben

Zeitschriftenartikel

Mapping the climate change challenge

Urheber*innen

Hallegatte,  S.
External Organizations;

Rogelj,  J.
External Organizations;

Allen,  M.
External Organizations;

Clarke,  L.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/Ottmar.Edenhofer

Edenhofer,  Ottmar
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Field,  C. B.
External Organizations;

Friedlingstein,  P.
External Organizations;

Kesteren,  L. van
External Organizations;

Knutti,  R.
External Organizations;

Mach,  K. J.
External Organizations;

Mastrandrea,  M.
External Organizations;

Michel,  A.
External Organizations;

/persons/resource/jan.minx

Minx.,  Jan C.
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

Oppenheimer,  M.
External Organizations;

Plattner,  G.-K.
External Organizations;

Riahi,  K.
External Organizations;

Schaeffer,  M.
External Organizations;

Stocker,  T. F.
External Organizations;

Vuuren,  D. van
External Organizations;

Externe Ressourcen
Es sind keine externen Ressourcen hinterlegt
Volltexte (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Volltexte in PIKpublic verfügbar
Ergänzendes Material (frei zugänglich)
Es sind keine frei zugänglichen Ergänzenden Materialien verfügbar
Zitation

Hallegatte, S., Rogelj, J., Allen, M., Clarke, L., Edenhofer, O., Field, C. B., Friedlingstein, P., Kesteren, L. v., Knutti, R., Mach, K. J., Mastrandrea, M., Michel, A., Minx., J. C., Oppenheimer, M., Plattner, G.-K., Riahi, K., Schaeffer, M., Stocker, T. F., Vuuren, D. v. (2016): Mapping the climate change challenge. - Nature Climate Change, 6, 7, 663-668.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3057


Zitierlink: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_21435
Zusammenfassung
Discussions on a long-term global goal to limit climate change, in the form of an upper limit to warming, were only partially resolved at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change negotiations in Paris, 2015. Such a political agreement must be informed by scientific knowledge. One way to communicate the costs and benefits of policies is through a mapping that systematically explores the consequences of different choices. Such a multi-disciplinary effort based on the analysis of a set of scenarios helped structure the IPCC AR5 Synthesis Report. This Perspective summarizes this approach, reviews its strengths and limitations, and discusses how decision-makers can use its results in practice. It also identifies research needs that can facilitate integrated analysis of climate change and help better inform policy-makers and the public.