Deutsch
 
Datenschutzhinweis Impressum
  DetailsucheBrowse

Datensatz

DATENSATZ AKTIONENEXPORT
  Lessons Learned from the German Double Whammy: The Importance of Price Incentives and Targeted Compensation for the Design of Energy and Climate Policy

Hänsel, M. C., Kellner, M., Franks, R. M., Gruner, F., Kalkuhl, M., Knopp, F., Edenhofer, O. (2025): Lessons Learned from the German Double Whammy: The Importance of Price Incentives and Targeted Compensation for the Design of Energy and Climate Policy. - Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 19, 1, 131-137.
https://doi.org/10.1086/732190

Item is

Externe Referenzen

einblenden:

Urheber

einblenden:
ausblenden:
 Urheber:
Hänsel, Martin C.1, Autor              
Kellner, Maximilian1, Autor              
Franks, R. Maximilian1, Autor              
Gruner, Friedemann1, Autor              
Kalkuhl, Matthias1, Autor              
Knopp, Felix1, Autor              
Edenhofer, Ottmar1, Autor              
Affiliations:
1Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, ou_persistent13              

Inhalt

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Schlagwörter: -
 Zusammenfassung: Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has led to unprecedented geopolitical and global economic challenges, including a severe shortfall in energy supply and a substantial increase in energy prices. Even before that crisis, many governments were aiming to phase out fossil energy. Here, we focus on the importance of demand-side policies, using the German double whammy as a case study. This was a large-scale policy package to incentivize energy savings and compensate households using a so-called price brake. We explain that the natural gas “price brake” was in fact not a price brake but, quite the contrary, maintained price incentives in combination with financial lump-sum transfers to natural gas consumers. We present an assessment of key features and distributional consequences of the “price brake” and then discuss the lessons learned for future policy design in Germany and beyond: First, maintaining strong price incentives for reducing demand can be politically feasible. Second, hardship can be avoided at the least economic cost if transfers are targeted to lower-income consumers, which is not the case in Germany.

Details

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Sprache(n): eng - Englisch
 Datum: 2025-01-142025-01-14
 Publikationsstatus: Final veröffentlicht
 Seiten: -
 Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
 Inhaltsverzeichnis: -
 Art der Begutachtung: Expertenbegutachtung
 Identifikatoren: DOI: 10.1086/732190
PIKDOMAIN: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
PIKDOMAIN: Director / Executive Staff / Science & Society
Organisational keyword: RD5 - Climate Economics and Policy - MCC Berlin
Organisational keyword: Director Edenhofer
Working Group: Welfare and Policy Design
MDB-ID: pending
Research topic keyword: Carbon Pricing
Research topic keyword: Climate Policy
Research topic keyword: Economics
Research topic keyword: Inequality and Equity
Research topic keyword: Policy Advice
Regional keyword: Europe
Regional keyword: Germany
Model / method: Qualitative Methods
Model / method: Quantitative Methods
 Art des Abschluß: -

Veranstaltung

einblenden:

Entscheidung

einblenden:

Projektinformation

einblenden:

Quelle 1

einblenden:
ausblenden:
Titel: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Genre der Quelle: Zeitschrift, SCI, Scopus
 Urheber:
Affiliations:
Ort, Verlag, Ausgabe: -
Seiten: - Band / Heft: 19 (1) Artikelnummer: - Start- / Endseite: 131 - 137 Identifikator: CoNE: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/cone/journals/resource/Review-Environmental-Economics-Policy